I just wanted to add to Vlad’s post and show the current progress of generating the Visual Studio Project made this weekend by Vlad and I.
By using the approach mentioned in Vlad’s post we can target Visual Studio directly instead of a build system like Ninja. This gives Visual Studio the correct build flags for each file allowing features like IntelliSense and building from Visual Studio using MSBuild to work perfectly. I’m generating a project per shared library and a Visual Studio solution to group the results together. The results are quite neat because it shows at a glance which sources files are included in each library. Any files listed in the visual studio project are safe to edit which should cover the common developer workflow of editing cpp/headers and recompiling. Other rarer changes for platform developers like adding a new file and tweaking build settings should be done by closing visual studio, doing a local change and rebuilding with the mozilla build system and re-openning the updated Visual Studio Solution.
Visual Studio IntelliSense + Build
This isn’t ready for general use yet because we still don’t generate the Link step properly and handle some corner cases in XUL yet but simpler libraries like gkmedias.dll is already working well. Supporting XUL should only require a few days of work. Once this is fixed we can move to supporting advanced Visual Studio features like “Edit and Continue” and distributed compiling.
Last week I attended the snappy work week with goal of syncing up with Julian Seward and Mike Hommey regarding the new Breakpad unwinding feature, planning and prioritizing new feature work. I also got lots of valuable feedback. Here’s what you need to know if you’re a frequent user of the Gecko Profiler.
Breakpad Unwinding (Mobile)
For the last few months Julian has been spearheading integrating the breakpad unwinding feature to the Gecko Profiler. This turned out to be a very complicated task because we’re trying to use Breakpad for something it wasn’t meant to do. This work is now landed but it only works in a very specific build configuration (unwind tables, unpacking the libraries, no elfhack). We are currently working on addressing these problems to make it work in the default Nightly configuration.
Our current target is to use Breakpad unwinding in the Linux May 1st nightly. A week later have the Fennec nightly support breakpad unwinding. I’m hoping afterwards to support Breakpad unwinding on B2G central (not b2g18) but I expect this may be difficult on a memory constraint phone so I currently have no estimate for this at this time.
If you looked at the code for the profiler you may notice TableTicker1+TableTicker2. During the work week we refactored the code significantly to address this code duplication while resolving inconsistencies between the frame-pointer unwinder and the Breakpad unwinder.
The profiler will soon support showing samples and timelines for multiple threads. This is already somewhat supported on B2G if you use a script written by Vlad. This will become easier as we begin to add multi-thread support to all the platform backends (already in progress for Mac and Linux) thanks to the help of James Willcox. This ties in heavily with the next two section (IPDL/Plugins).
Plugin issues have long been identified as the single biggest contributor to responsiveness issues by Vladan‘s Chrome Hang work. This was the topic of the break out discussion headed by Benjamin Smedberg. We discussed a plan of attack by adding profiling to the plugin process which should land this week but require a manual step. This feature will let us know what’s going on in the plugin process when the browser’ main thread is waiting for an IPC response (and vice versa). It will improve as we add profiling support for profiling IPDL messages.
Flash initializing audio on plugin-container startup.
IPDL Message Support
During the week we decided to add profiler labels to each IPDL call automatically. That will help where the unwinder isn’t supported but doesn’t give us the data we need. In particular we’re looking to get better data about how IPDL messages are queued, how long they take to get dequeued and to processed. Combined with the Plugin support this should help us diagnose complex issues with our plugin-container or get better data on how particular plugins are hurting the responsiveness of the browser. Georg Fritzsche has an excellent plan in bug 853864 on how to implement this.
In a previous blog post I asked for volunteers to send in their shutdown profiles automatically. I’ve received hundreds of slow shutdown profiles, 30 profiles of which are over 10 seconds and one as high as 80 seconds! These profiles show us where Firefox is spending its time when closing down to the millisecond.
Before I started this experiment I asked around for what people thought was the cause of the slow shutdowns. The overwhelming response I got was that it was Garbage Collection and Cycle Collection. While those operations do make the shutdowns slower, they were rarely responsible for those 10 to 80 seconds shutdown times.
Here’s some interesting issues we found:
- A few start-up optimizations moved operations off the startup path and into timers that would update the startup cache, or load fonts. These timers were never canceled when shutting down so they would lead to things such as font loading while shutting down. Since you have to open & close the browser within a minute to see these issues they are not critical for our users but these are certainly bugs we are cleaning up. Keep in mind if you are running timers you should stop them on shutdown before they fire if they are no longer useful.
- On a related note we have timers going off during the shutdown. Particularly GC and CC timers. There is no guarantee that the shutdown will take long enough for these timers to run. If these are useless then we will waste time but if they are important they may not run.
- Stopping plug-ins can take up to a second. I do not capture what is happening in the plug-in process so I can’t tell if it’s our container or the plug-in.
- Releasing style sheets on shutdown will sometimes total over 1 second of execution on slow shutdown.
- Time spent in sqlite3close in some profiles is as high as 10 seconds.
- Bookmark backups are hurting us.
A big thumbs up to people who are submitting shutdown profiles. The data we are collecting is very valuable in helping us understand how Firefox behaves outside the labs.
Does your Firefox take a long time to shutdown? Do you get “Firefox is already running” messages when restarting? Well the Firefox Performance team would like to fix that, so please keep reading!
The Gecko Profiler extension now has a new feature called the (Automatic) ‘Performance Reporter’. If you opt into this feature, the profiler will watch your browser for any performance hiccups and will automatically send a detailed bug report for the Performance team to fix! Currently, this Performance Reporter feature monitors only your browser’s shutdown behavior and only sends us a report if shutdown takes longer then 1.5 seconds, but we would like to extend it to cover all aspects of Firefox performance. The reporter works in the background and does not interfere with your use of the browser.
The performance reports contain the URLs of the tabs you have open and are uploaded publicly for processing, so if you are not comfortable with communicating this information, do not enable this feature — we understand! We have taken precautions to never record anything coming from a private browsing window. Also, please note that the Performance Reporter is not related to Firefox’s Telemetry or Health Report features which never send any sensitive information such as URLs. The Performance Reporter is different — it collects very rich data so we can get a complete picture of any performance problem.
How do you turn this on? Make sure you’re running the latest version of the Gecko Profiler which should read as v1.11.17 or later. If I have not scared you away great, turning on the Performance Reporter is as simple as flipping ‘profiler.performanceReporter’ in about:config.
We’ve previously added video profiles in mobile and run them daily with eideticker. Here’s a proof a concept for doing the same thing for tracking page load on desktop.
This works by tagging frames and CPU samples with a frame number. During the analysis we use this information to correlate the video stream with the CPU samples. This lets us take something like a page load, slow it down and watch what we’re executing at each frame.
Take a look at this profile and follow along. I’ll only describe 4 interesting frames but feel free to look at the rest. When seeking with the video the corresponding region will be highlighted in the profile timeline. You can then click on samples in that timeline and they will be selected and appear as green:
- Seek to 4 seconds where the page is requested. This will continue to 5.5 seconds. During this we see a little network activity and a bit of work compositing to update the throbber. This is no surprise since my WiFi signal was poor.
- Seek to 5.5 seconds where the page starts to appear on screen. Lets look closer at the first frame in order.
- 20 ms compiling JS
- 8 ms executing the JS from the page
- 5 ms is spent in Adblock
- 11 ms processing styles
- 37 ms reflowing the page, 16 ms of which is doing main thread IO loading fonts when calling ‘CGFontCreateWithFontName’.
- Negligible time building the display list (profiler sampling rate too high)
- 19 ms drawing and compositing
- Seek to 5.9 seconds where we are waiting on the plugin to load. The plugin takes 200ms to load. This means we miss several frames.
- Seek to about 7.3 seconds. During this frame the plugin stream is created. This adds another 100 ms delay.
Video Profile of Page Load
My goal is to start making video capture features into the profiler add-on to make these profiles easier to capture.
I made my first small WebGL app that fetches a star catalog and displays stars within 25 parsec (80 lightyear) using WebGL+Three.JS. I also created a second view that will only show named star and will try to fetch their Wikipedia page on mouse over.
I didn’t trim the catalog so be prepared to wait for 8mb of text to load :).
Try it out:
View 1: Stars within 80 light years
View 2: Named stars only
This demo is missing a lot of optimization so it shouldn’t be used for benchmarking.
I also unfortunately didn’t get around to calculating and displaying the relative size of each star.
I posted a change to TryChooser that will fetch the build queue and display it when selecting tests. Do your part by avoiding platforms with large queues if possible to get your results faster and help reduce contention.
TryChooser Load: Avoid platforms with high numbers.